Figure Size : They Don’t Make Millimeters Like They Used To

More on ‘Figure Size’. This time from January 1966…

A Call to Reason:

OR

They Don’t Make Millimeters Like They Used to

By: Aram Bakshian Jr.

Table Top Talk, January 1966

The past several years have witnessed a mysterious change in the millimeter. Like some elderly matron with a taste for chocolates, the millimeter has lost its youthful figure and gradually expanded!

At least, that is the conclusion one draws when examining some of the model soldiers designated by their manufacturers as “20mm scale”. Some of them stand an inch high, some less than three-quarters of an inch. The effect, when they are viewed side by side, is that of a confrontation between Charles DeGaulle and Mickey Mouse!

Dr. DeGre’s recent proposal that wargamers and collectors band together and declare 20mm scale to equal l/8th of an inch to the foot may have come too late, but it is an excellent one.

Of course there has always been a great deal of variance in miniatures of all types. Anyone who has ever stood a Graham Farish or a Vertunni next to a Metayer or a Mignot knows what I mean. In addition, the same designer may unwittingly slip over the years, or change his “interpretation” of the millimeter.

Compare an early Bussler Revolutionary War Costume piece with his later Battle of Trenton series. In theory they are both “standard 54mm scale!”. In reality one is a short scare crow, the other is an over-stuffed giant! More than one outspoken critic of the magnificent Stadden line has been heard to remark that his remakes look considerably taller and better-fed than his initial models. I also heard one add that they seem to suffer from a strange glandular disorder which results in swollen heads lengthy arms and shrunken feet! This of course, is debatable, and the real issue does not concern any one maker alone.

For despite the myriad of individual preferences and prejudices, all collectors and wargamers can agree on the fact that 1 mm equals 1mm – never any more or less!

The simple table at the end of this article speaks for itself. A figure that is 1” high may be excellently crafted, but it simply is not 20mm!

In a way, while no fraud is intended, there is a great deal of “error” in manufacturers’ designation of scale.

1mm equals . 03937 inch – therefore:

20mm equals . 7874 Inches

30mm equals 1.181 inches

54mm equals 2.125 inches

Photo Album : Southampton, England: 1961

And now for something completely different…

For your viewing pleasure some photos from the Wargamers Convention held in Southampton, England in 1961.

Geoff Kelker and Warwick Hale

Bill Mell, David Bradley and Frank Tippetts

Peter Pringle, Charles Grant and Tony Bath

Graham Biddle, Roy Blackman, Ken Crawford and Geoff Kelker

Donald Featherstone and Stan Aspinall

Brig. Peter Young, Bill Mell, Donald Featherstone and Stan Aspinall

Sorry about the quality of the images. The original photos were in pretty bad shape, so I had to work with some rather old reproductions…

Figure Size : Small Scale War Game Figures (16mm)

Again on the subject of ‘Figure Size’ I have reread a 1958 article by A.W. Saunders. I this article Mr. Saunders tells us about his new 5/8 inch war game figures. Some quick math tells us that 5/6 inch come to about 15.875mm, so if we round up we arrive at 16mm. I do recall reading about other 16mm figures, but this is the earliest reference I can find. These were not commercial figures, but this is yet another indication that the figure size was chosen for its fit with model kits about the size of the TT railroad scale (TT scale is a model railroad scale; size of which falls in between HO and N scale.  Its actual scale measurement is 1/120, or 0.10 inch = one foot, or one inch = ten feet). Lastly we will also note the size designation is 5/8 rather than some millimeter designation.

Small Scale War Game Figures
By A.W. Saunders

The War Game Digest – December 1958

In recent years many war game players have gone down in scale as far as war games go, Not so many years ago the standard size 54 mm models were locked upon as ideal for the armchair general, but it will be remembered by most that H.G. Wells advocated the use of smaller figures, Not so very long ago came the 30 mm S.A.E. figures, and ideal size for the game and may collectors went over to this scale as one giving much more table room, New with the advent of the excellent Greenwood and Ball figures, produced by Jack Scruby at a reasonable price, many players seem to be going down to 3/4 inch figures which to my mind is a better size for realism? I myself have of recent months gone down to an even smaller figure one 5/8 of an inch tall, As a staunch advocate of the smaller figure for war games, my watchful eye saw not so long ago in the British Home stores some really fine little plastic kits at only 1/ each, roughly about l4 cents The series on sale included Civil War locomotives, prairie wagons, horse drawn fire pumps, coronation coach, stage coach and three types of aeroplanes all in about the TT railroad scale, which by my reckoning makes an infantryman 5/8ths of an inch. By the way I am sure that these kits originated from the Ideal Toy Corp, of the U.S.

I began to ponder on the whys and wherefores of these kits and decided to have a shot at using the excellent material available for moulding and casting, The supply wagons of course were cheap enough to buy and use as bought and for artillery wheels and cavalry horses the fire pump kit supplied three horses per kit and two wheels of just the right size for cannon and limbers. The coronation coach had the riders I wanted and a mould was soon made of these and the fire pump horses. Both came out of the mould very well and very soon two cavalry squadrons of twenty troopers each were made aid painted. I found the wheels almost impossible to cast so went out and bought up the entire stock if fire pumps in the stores, finishing up eventually something like 30 fire pumps which gave me a total of 60 wheels and 90 horses, then I came to the great snag, the infantrymen.

This little figure I made myself, but try as I might, I could not get out very good castings, I sent them to Jack Scruby for his inspection and back came the suggestion that solved the problem, if I never did thank you for this Jack, thanks a lot. The solution was simple, make a thicker base and fill from this base.

With the infantryman solved, I soon amassed a sizeable number in all, to date, I have made and painted 240 infantrymen, 40 cavalry and two cannon with 10 cannoneers Of course as homemade figures, the models are not in great detail, in fact this isn’t needed in such a small scale. Look at them singly and one doesn’t think much of them, but put them out enmasse on the table with colours flying and the effect of the whole is quite satisfying, almost as if one were in Professor Lowes’ balloon hovering over the battle field. The extra room gained for maneuvers makes the whole lot of hard work I have put in worth it and already I have mad moulds and cast some modern figures for a game of this period, (1939-45), In this case the infantryman is in exact scale with the Authenticast tanks.

I am finding too, that with this very small scale, I can become ambitious as far as the Civil war goes bring into the game much that would not be possible on my ten by five table with 30 mm figures. It is well known that the Civil War, as much if not more than most wars, brought into play the whole panoply of the art of war. This terrible conflict saw terrific land fighting in field warfare, sieges and far flung cavalry raids. A blockade was carried out by the north and some very fierce naval warfare took place on the rivers, submarines of great ingenuity were used, manned by crews of great courage. Partisan activity was rife. In fact their isn’t much in the art of war that cannot-be tried out on the war game table in period, no wonder the Civil War is such a favorite with so many war gamers.

John Greenwood : Tabletop General

While browsing for information concerning ‘Figure Size’ I came upon this piece on John Greenwood. It is one I enjoyed reading many years ago, and though it might be a good time to share this with you. Originally presented in: The War Game Digest – Winter 1962

John Greenwood

Born 1893 at Lowestoft, Suffolk. Lived at Scarborough from the age of l month until 1909, in which year I moved to Newcastle to serve an apprenticeship. During this early period of my life the model soldier bug bit me, as during the South African War of 1899-1902 the daily illustrated papers were full of war pictures and my father explained much of the material to; so in 1899, to the question, “What would you like for Christmas?” the answer was invariably, “Soldiers”, and it was a great Christmas: British-made Cavalry, Infantry, Mule Battery, and German-made Field Artillery. This interest was maintained by the Sum er Camps on the local race-course of Volunteers, and later, Territorials, with field days and sham fights. When at Newcastle, there was always something of military interest to be seen or read– troops on Church Parade, books on Army life,and in the papers there were reports on the various Balkan Wars and so forth.

Then, in 1914 out of a summer sky came the Great War. On the fourth of September I went to Manchester and joined the 2/6th Battalion, Manchester Regiment. This was a Territorial Battalion, but what a wonderful lot of fellows to be with. In May 1915 I sailed with 49 other volunteers to replace sick, etc. as the lst Battalion sailed from garrison duty in Egypt to Gallipolli. We arrived at Cape Helles, Gallipoli, in June and I found the lst Battalion fellows as good to get along with as the 2nd Battalion. 1915 Gallipoli; 1916 Sinai Desert Campaign; 1917-18-19 France and Flanders: that was the “Cook’s Tour” and I think I had my money’s worth. For people interested in this sort of thing, the pay was 1/- (about 15 cents) a day when I joined and also for the next three years. I returned to civilian life in 1919 and up to 1936 had various jobs as a salesman, none of which produced a fortune.

In 1936 I was staying with the late Mrs. Ball and her daughter Kathleen, and as some of you may know, began trying to make realistic-looking chessmen, and this started me off on model-making. The whole thing was an “earn while you learn” business for Kathleen and myself. We both had great patience and the ambition to reach the highest standard we were capable of. Gradually the thing developed and we employed girls and taught them to paint. Then came the second Great War and we switched over to making training tables for the Army and the Home Guard. This kept us going, and after the war business came along; at one of the British Society’s meetings the late Otto Gottstein approached us on the subject of figures for dioramas. A team was formed under his direction of Denny C. Stokes to make the dioramas, and Greenwood and Ball to make the figures. Dioramas were made for the R.U.S.I., Arromanches Museum, and the History of the Jewish Nation.

In the last few years Stokes and I have worked together on a wide variety of dioramas, both military and commercial. At present I am working on figures for a series of dioramas he is making of the war—time activities of the Royal Army Medical Corps. Kathleen still carries on with the trade sign of Greenwood and Ball 54 mm. figures and I am concentrating on 1 inch and 3/4 inch figures for collectors. I have also made a few complete dioramas for private collectors, two for the West Point Museum and a third one on the way to competition.

About four years ago, when we were in Broseley, Bill and Helen Imrie called to see us, and we had a very enjoyable day with those two very charming people. Bill and I still correspond and do the odd spot of trade with each other. When the War Game Digest came out, Jack Scruby and I made contact and this started a grand friendship, although we never met. The War Game Digest is something to look forward to, and a most interesting development has been the Scruby and Greenwood War Game figures. I get a real kick out of the narratives of Table Top battles reporting “G&B 3/4 figures were used in this battle”.

Of course, I don’t think it’s possible to make model soldiers for others people and not a want; a few yourself; that leads up to, “What do I collect?” Slowly and laboriously, owing to the time factor, I have during the last few years produced some small 3/4 inch forces, not big enough in numbers to be called armies. They are compact forces of about 200 each; British and German in Tin Hat? with some  armoured Cars, Tanks and Lorries; World War l British in Peak Gaps and Slouch Hats; British in full dress 1900; and smaller French forces of the same period.

Building up the country for War Games has been as enjoyable as pre—fishing preparations, and has resulted in a nice collection of Faller buildings with a good but limited range of plastic trees and some home—made ones which look fairly good but are not well known types! Next effort will be the countryside which must be fairly changeable, and this is a very interesting problem to solve. With luck I should have a solo War Game going by next winter.

That is the life—story of old man Greenwood; you may not enjoy reading it, but I’ve enjoyed living it– most of it anyway.

The ECONOMY Line of War Game Miniatures

There has been a bit more talk and pondering on the subject of  the Napoleonic 20mm Economy Line…

To that end I’m posting the text, from the 1968 Scruby catalog concerning this line of figures.

Remember the following text is from the 1968 catalog; availability, metal composition and pricing do not apply to any current HistoriFigs product offerings.

Scruby Economy Line

For the war gamer who has an eye on his pocketbook, we are designing a new line of SCRUBY ECONOMY MINIATURES cast in metal, in both 20 and 30mm scale. These models will be cast in battery—molds and are simplified versions of some of our best and most popular war game figures.

Our object in doing this is to put a good quality, economically priced figure on the market for the war game player who wants mass armies. Most of the SCRUBY ECONOMY MINIATURES will be of the type of soldier that made up the “bulk” of the “Conscript armies” that began during the Napoleonic wars.

For example, in a French Napoleonic Battalion, the buyer could use 10 Grenadiers and 10 Voltigeurs of the regular Scruby Miniatures for his elite companies; and forty Scruby Economy Models for the Fusilier companies, which formed the bulk of the battalion.

The difference between a Regular Scruby Miniature and the ECONOMY MINIATURES-is that the latter have been re—designed so they can be cast quickly and easily in battery molds. They lack such details as bayonets and sword scabbards, and have little or no “undercuts, all of which makes a figure more realistic, but that much more difficult to cast.

Because two to four castings can be cast at one time, costs are reduced also, and these savings can be passed on to you in lower prices of the models.

SCRUBY ECONOMY MINIATURES ARE CAST OF 50/50 TIN—ALLOY METAL, THE SAME AS OUR HIGH-QUALITY STANDARD MODELS. BECAUSE OF THEIR ORIGINAL LOW PRICES, NO VOLUME DISCOUNTS ARE ALLOWED.

3OMM SCRUBY ECONOMY MINIATURES…. 15¢ each

20MM SCRUBY ECONOMY MINIATURES…. 12¢ each

(Postage additional)

THE NAPOLEONIC WARS…. 30mm Scale

T-1….French and/or Prussian Fusilier, firing
T-2…. French and/or Prussian Fusilier, on guard
T-3…. British Regular, Waterloo shako, firing
T-4…. British Regular, Waterloo shako, on guard

THE NAPOLEONIC WARS….. 20mm Scale

B-1….. French and/Prussian Fusilier, firing (can be painted as either)
B-2….. French and/or Prussian Fusilier, advancing
B-3….. French and/or Prussian Fusilier, on guard
B-4….. British Regular, firing (Waterloo shake)
B-5….. British Regular, on guard (Waterloo shako)
B-6….. Austrian Musketeer, 1809 helmet, firing
B-7….. Russian Musketeer, 1812, firing
B-8….. Russian Musketeer, 1812, on guard

—-

Look for more on this topic in the coming days…