The Case for 18th Century War Games

Two. Count them, two posts in a single day!

This post came about after reading a question Why Game the SYW? posted over on the The Miniatures Page 

The Miniatures Page

I already had this short piece in my queue for posting, so I figured why not post it now? It winds up being at least somewhat topical.

 line

FORGET ABOUT NAPOLEON:
THE CASE FOR EIGHTEENTH CENTURY WARGAMES

by Aram Bakshian, Jr.
Table Top Talk,  September 1966

I don’t doubt for a moment that the majority of wargamers are Napoleonic buffs… I just regret it. And, at the risk of offending some of the harder cases, I am entering this brief plea for another period.

One author has called it the “century that sparkled,” and indeed it did. Militarily, it was the age of splendid uniforms, elaborate formations, ingrained spit-and-polish, and officers were usually gentlemen amateurs. Since most of us are amateurs, if not gentlemen, we have at least one automatic link with the generals of this delightful era.

The scope is tremendous. I can think of a dozen different wars offhand… there were many more. Each one was distinctly different. Battles were fought from one side of the globe to the other. Sepoys and elephants, garlic – belching Corsican mountaineers, wild pandour and grenz infantry, Cossacks and Tartars, and, of course, the mighty regular armies of Europe, each with distinctive uniforms, drill and tactics, and an assortment of generals that would rival any gallery of great geniuses and eccentrics.

Like wars on the tabletop, the real wars of this period were usually fought over trifles. No blithering about a “people’s war”; no pushy little Corsican telling Frenchmen how to be patriotic and endlessly haranguing about “la gloire” (which was, incidentally, invented under the old regime).

Perhaps the greatest tribute which can be paid the 18th century is that it gave birth to nearly all the great men and ideas of the Napoleonic era. The sleek canons of Gribeauval, the daring and imaginative use of light troops, experimentation with line and column; the list is endless.

One final irony. The British Army was the true product of the 18th century, and Wellington was the very model, of the 18th century officer and gentlemen (both his virtues and his faults reflect this). Together, they managed to trounce you-know-who rather nicely!

All this by way of arguing that information on this period would be of interest to many readers, especially after the recent massive Napoleonic over-dose!

7 thoughts on “The Case for 18th Century War Games

    • 18th Century might actually be my favorite period to war game – however, I believe that I have more Napoleonic figures than I do 18th Century figures.

  1. If my memory serves, this was originally accompanied by a funny cartoon of Frederick the Great bopping Napoleon on the head with a telescope and saying “My century is better than yours” (or words to that effect).

    • Ross, You are correct (but I don’t recall the caption) – I’ll have to go back and scan the image and add it to the post.

  2. Which scale do you prefer 15mm or 25/28mm and why? Any and all opinions welcome. I’ve never been into the period but after reading the TMP post it sounds like I just may be “hooked” into it sometime…

    • Reid: I prefer 25/28/30mm for 18th Century. Ideally I’d go with true 20mm, but too few of those around, so I go with a mix of 25/28/30mm figures (Scruby & Bloodaxe mostly). As for why. Two reasons I guess: 1) I don’t make any 15mm figures for the period and 2) I like the look of the large figures better Oh, I do have SYW armies in N-Gauge, but they are not used much.

  3. IN 7YW I have armies in 25mm (Scruby)…my first wargame army…, 40mm (home cast and Irregular min.), and 30mm …..great period for wargaming!

Comments are closed.